4.6 Article

Improved energy density of quasi-solid-state supercapacitors using sandwich-type redox-active gel polymer electrolytes

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 150-156

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.114

关键词

Supercapacitor; Gel polymer electrolyte; Redox additive; Hydroquinone; Methylene blue

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1205112, 21301060, 61306077]
  2. Doctoral Supervisor Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [20123501110001]
  3. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY106]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University [2014FJ-NCET-ZR02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quasi-solid-state supercapacitors were assembled using a pair of activated carbon electrodes and two polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-H2SO4 gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs) containing respectively redox additives of hydroquinone (HQ) and methylene blue (MB), which were separated by a Nafion 117 membrane in a sandwich-type configuration. PVA-H2SO4-HQ and PVA-H2SO4-MB GPEs worked on the sides of the positive and negative electrodes of the supercapacitor, respectively. The electrochemical performances of the supercapacitor with optimized PVA-H2SO4-HQ and PVA-H2SO4-MB GPEs were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques. After the introduction of HQ and MB, the supercapacitor with PVA-H2SO4-HQ|PVA-H2SO4-MB GPEs can exhibit high specific capacitance of 563.7 F g(-1) and energy density of 18.7 Wh Kg(-1), increasing by about fourfold in comparison with a supercapacitor with a PVA-H2SO4 GPE. The improved energy storage is ascribed to the reversible Faradaic reactions related to HQ and MB in the corresponding gel polymer electrolytes. Additionally, the supercapacitor shows excellent cyclic durability with 90.0% capacitance retention after 3000 cycles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据