4.6 Article

Reactive Mechanisms of LSCF Single-Phase and LSCF-CGO Composite Electrodes Operated in Anodic and Cathodic Polarisations

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 1299-1316

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.080

关键词

SOEC; SOFC; Modeling; Electrode kinetics; MIEC; LSCF; LSCF-CGO; composite electrode

资金

  1. European Union [FCH-JU-2013-1, 621173, 621207]
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-house model for a MIEC or MIEC-CGO composite has been built in order to analyse the electrode operating mechanisms in anodic and cathodic polarisations (SOEC and SOFC modes). A special attention has been paid to take into account the electrode microstructure properties as well as the most likely processes occurring therein. The reactive pathway has been divided in a sequence of reaction steps with a first oxidoreduction at the gas/MIEC surface, and a second one in parallel at the electrode TPBs. The model has been calibrated on experimental data recorded at 800 degrees C on a LSCF electrode tested in a symmetrical test configuration. A good agreement was found between simulated and experimental polarisation curves by using the electrode microstructural properties extracted from a 3D reconstruction obtained by FIB-SEM tomography. Considering the LSCF single-phase electrode, simulation results have highlighted that the reactive pathway is governed by the oxygen exchange at the gas/MIEC surface in cathodic polarisation. The mechanism is found to remain unchanged at low anodic polarisation, whereas oxidation at TPBs becomes the predominant reactive pathway at higher polarisation. For the LSCF-CGO composite, simulations have shown that the reactive mechanism is governed by the charge transfer at TPBs whatever the electrode polarisation. Thanks to sensitivity analysis, the rate-limiting steps of the different reactive pathways are also discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据