4.7 Article

Chaotic quadruple secular evolution and the production of misaligned exomoons and Warm Jupiters in stellar multiples

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3005

关键词

planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planet-star interactions; binaries: general

资金

  1. Israel-US bi-national science foundation, BSF [2012384]
  2. European union
  3. Minerva centre for life under extreme planetary conditions
  4. Israel science foundation excellence centre I-CORE [1829/12]
  5. NASA [NNX14AP31G]
  6. NSF [AST-1715246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the chaotic and secular evolution of hierarchical quadruple systems in the 3 + 1 configuration, focusing on the evolution of mutual inclination of the inner binaries as the system undergoes coupled Lidov-Kozai (LK) oscillations. We include short-range forces (SRF; such as those due to tidal and rotational distortions) that control the eccentricity excitation of the inner binary. The evolution of mutual inclination is described, a priori, by two dimensionless parameters, R-0, the ratio between the inner and outer LK time-scales and epsilon(SRF), the ratio between the SRF precession and the inner LK precession rates. We find that the chaotic zones for the mutual inclination depend mainly on R-0, while epsilon(SRF) controls mainly the range of eccentricity excitation. The mutual inclination evolves chaotically for 1 less than or similar to R-0 less than or similar to 10, leading to large misalignments. For 0.4 less than or similar to R-0 less than or similar to 0.8, the system could be weakly excited and produce bimodal distribution of mutual inclination angles. Our results can be applied to exomoons-planets in stellar binaries and Warm/Hot Jupiters in stellar triples. Such systems could develop large mutual inclination angles if the inner binary is tight enough, and also high eccentricities, depending on the strength of the SRFs. Future detections of tilted Warm/Hot Jupiters and exomoons could put our mechanism under observational tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据