4.8 Review

Recent progress in phosphorus based anode materials for lithium/sodium ion batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 290-322

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.020

关键词

Lithium ion batteries; Sodium ion batteries; Phosphorus carbon composites; Metal phosphides; Anode

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625102]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0204600]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51471053]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17XD1400700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus has aroused growing concern as a promising anode material for both lithium and sodium ion batteries, owning to its high theoretical capacity and appropriately low redox potential. However, the poor electronic conductivity and large volume expansion of phosphorus during cycling lead to low electrochemical activity and unstable cyclability, which limits its practical application. Recently, various nanostructured phosphorus based anodes, which efficiently restrained the pulverization and supplied faster reaction kinetics, have been developed to solve these issues. This review aims to summarize the major progress of nanostructured phosphorus based electrode materials for lithium/sodium ion batteries. We first examine the most widely-used design strategy of compositing phosphorus with various carbon materials, ranging from 0D particles, 1D tubes or fibers, 2D sheets to 3D frameworks. And then, the progress of various metal phosphides and their composites is discussed, which mainly include Sn-P phosphides, Ni-P phosphides, Cu-P phosphides, Fe-P phosphides, Co-P phosphides, etc., and their composites. This is followed by a comparison of different compositing methods, which involve in preparing phosphorus-carbon composites and nanostructured metal phosphides or their composites. Finally, the challenges and perspectives regarding the phosphorus based anode materials are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据