4.7 Article

Creating knowledge and entrepreneurial capacity for HE students with digital education methodologies: Differences in the perceptions of students and entrepreneurs

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 227-240

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.005

关键词

Entrepreneur's skills and knowledge; Digital learning; Learning methodologies; Learning systems

类别

资金

  1. Erasmus + (EC) [2016-1-TR01-KA205-033056]
  2. ATO - Chamber of Commerce of Ankara, Turkey
  3. Institute of Entrepreneurship Development, Greece
  4. Universidade Europeia, Portugal
  5. Florence University, Italy
  6. IBIMET, Italy
  7. Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This main paper goal is to propose a model of digital education methodologies and tools to develop knowledge and entrepreneurial capacity in Higher Education (HE) students. Digital education is increasingly influencing both classroom/campus-based teaching, but more import is leading to new models or designs for teaching and learning. The paper makes a literature review on e-education, start-up stages and e-education methodologies and tools to develop the entrepreneurial capacity and uses quantitative methodology based on an online questionnaire applied to a sample of 75 HE Students and 75 Entrepreneurs in order to identify differences in their perceptions regarding the stages of the start-up process and also the most relevant methodologies to develop the entrepreneurial capacity of a potential entrepreneur. The paper is structured of the following research questions: RQ1. What are the most important stages of the entrepreneurial start-up process? Moreover, RQ2-Which methods and methodologies can be employed to promote the entrepreneurial activity? Besides the analysis of the methodologies and the tools of digital education, the research will also propose a model of E-Education methodologies for entrepreneur's strategic knowledge and skills development in each stage of the start-up process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据