4.8 Article

Nature of extra capacity in MoS2 electrodes: Molybdenum atoms accommodate with lithium

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 37-45

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.025

关键词

Molybdenum disulfide; The extra capacity; Mo atoms accommodate with lithium; Li-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672078, 21473052]
  2. Hunan University State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body Independent Research Project [71675004]
  3. Hunan Youth Talents [2016RS3025]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion [J17-18-903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) layered transition metal sulfide based materials are promising candidates for electrodes of lithium ion batteries (LIBs). As one of the representatives, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), exhibits additional reversible capacity beyond their theoretical value although the lithium storage mechanism is still poorly understood. In this report, we developed a highly conducting metallic phase 1T(octahedral)-MoS2 based electrode with metal Mo atoms confined in graphene nanoreactor of abnormal lithium-storage sites, which delivered a high specific capacity of similar to 1800 mAh g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), about 2.6 times of its intercalation reactions value. Contrary to previous reports, a new lithium-storage mechanism for the high and ever-increasing capacity was proposed. The theoretical calculations and experiments show that a major contribution to the extra capacity in MoS2 anodes is due to Mo atoms accommodate with Li+. The Mo precipitates and their full contact with Li2S matrix enabled the reversible Mo -> LixMo -> Mo -> 1T-MoS2 reaction during charging/discharging processes. Over prolonged cycling, per Mo atomic could accommodate six Li+ ions. This new proposal could help to establish an accurate electrochemical reaction mechanism of MoS2 LIBs, which may lead to inspiration on new methods to greatly improve the performance of the MoS2 anode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据