4.5 Article

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PERSISTENT POST-CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN ADULTS

期刊

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 32-39

出版社

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2492

关键词

mild traumatic brain injury; post-concussion symptoms; anxiety; quality of life

资金

  1. Victorian Transport Accident Commission (TAC), Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Debate regarding factors associated with persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury continues. Nested within a trial aiming to change practice in emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury, this study investigated the nature of persistent symptoms, work/ study outcomes, anxiety and quality of life and factors associated with persistent symptoms following injury, including the impact of receiving information about mild traumatic brain injuries in the emergency department. Methods: A total of 343 individuals with mild traumatic brain injury completed the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale - Anxiety Scale, and Quality of Life - Short Form an average 7 months post-injury. Results: Overall, 18.7% of participants reported 3 or more post-concussional symptoms, most commonly fatigue (17.2%) and forgetfulness (14.6%). Clinically significant anxiety was reported by 12.8%, and was significantly associated with symptom reporting, as were mental and physical quality of life scores. Significant predictors of post-concussional symptoms at follow-up were pre-injury psychological issues, experiencing loss of consciousness, and having no recall of receiving information about brain injury in the emergency department. Conclusion: This study confirms that loss of consciousness and pre-injury psychological issues are associated with persistent symptom reporting. Not receiving injury information in the emergency department may also negatively influence symptom reporting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据