4.6 Article

Metallic P3C monolayer as anode for sodium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 405-411

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta09155b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21573037, 21873017, 11704062, 51732003]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2013M541283]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20150101042JC]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2412017QD006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have become one of the most promising energy storage devices due to the high abundance and safety of sodium. On the other hand, most of the well-developed technologies in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) can be migrated to SIBs. However, unfortunately, the known anode materials are not suitable in SIBs as a result of the larger atomic radius of sodium compared with lithium. Phosphorus demonstrates an unprecedented high theoretical capacity in SIBs, but its inherent low electrical conductivity and huge volume expansion upon sodiation greatly restrict the cycle stability. Two-dimensional materials as electrodes have shown unique advantages in contrast to their bulk counterparts. In this work, we identify a hitherto unknown P3C monolayer with a puckered honeycomb structure through first-principles swarm-intelligence structure calculations. More intriguingly, the predicted theoretical capacity of P3C as an anode for SIBs is up to 1022 mAg h(-1), corresponding to a stoichiometry of P3CNa4. Metallic P3C and P3CNa4 can provide good electrical conductivity during the battery cycle. The acceptable barrier energy and lower open-circuit voltage ensure good rate capacity and safety in practical applications. Its outstanding performance is attributed to the unique arrangement of two kinds of hexagon rings (i.e. P-6 and P4C2), producing high cohesive energy and thermodynamic stability. These desirable properties render P3C monolayers as a promising two-dimensional material for application in SIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据