4.6 Article

Transcription factor family-specific DNA shape readout revealed by quantitative specificity models

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20167238

关键词

binding specificity; DNA shape; feature selection; quantitative modeling; transcription factor

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM106056, U01GM103804]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  3. Israel Science Foundation [317/13]
  4. Raymond and Beverly Sackler Chair in Bioinformatics
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics at Tel Aviv University
  8. National Science Foundation [MCB-1413539]
  9. Dan David Prize scholarships
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences
  11. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1413539] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcription factors (TFs) achieve DNA-binding specificity through contacts with functional groups of bases (base readout) and readout of structural properties of the double helix (shape readout). Currently, it remains unclear whether DNA shape readout is utilized by only a few selected TF families, or whether this mechanism is used extensively by most TF families. We resequenced data from previously published HT-SELEX experiments, the most extensive mammalian TF-DNA binding data available to date. Using these data, we demonstrated the contributions of DNA shape readout across diverse TF families and its importance in core motifflanking regions. Statistical machine-learning models combined with feature-selection techniques helped to reveal the nucleotide position-dependent DNA shape readout in TF-binding sites and the TF family-specific position dependence. Based on these results, we proposed novel DNA shape logos to visualize the DNA shape preferences of TFs. Overall, this work suggests a way of obtaining mechanistic insights into TF-DNA binding without relying on experimentally solved all-atom structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据