4.6 Article

Personal model-assisted identification of NAD+ and glutathione metabolism as intervention target in NAFLD

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20167422

关键词

glutathione; NAFLD; personalized genome-scale metabolic modeling; serine

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Foundation
  4. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  5. EU
  6. Helsinki University Central Hospital EVO funds, Finland
  7. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  8. Foundation Leducq France
  9. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under EMIF grant [115372]
  10. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF16OC0021202] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), we recruited 86 subjects with varying degrees of hepatic steatosis (HS). We obtained experimental data on lipoprotein fluxes and used these individual measurements as personalized constraints of a hepatocyte genome-scale metabolic model to investigate metabolic differences in liver, taking into account its interactions with other tissues. Our systems level analysis predicted an altered demand for NAD(+) and glutathione (GSH) in subjects with high HS. Our analysis and metabolomic measurements showed that plasma levels of glycine, serine, and associated metabolites are negatively correlated with HS, suggesting that these GSH metabolism precursors might be limiting. Quantification of the hepatic expression levels of the associated enzymes further pointed to altered de novo GSH synthesis. To assess the effect of GSH and NAD(+) repletion on the development of NAFLD, we added precursors for GSH and NAD(+) biosynthesis to the Western diet and demonstrated that supplementation prevents HS in mice. In a proof-of-concept human study, we found improved liver function and decreased HS after supplementation with serine (a precursor to glycine) and hereby propose a strategy for NAFLD treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据