4.8 Article

Prenatal fever and autism risk

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 759-766

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.119

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [U01 NS47537, R56 NS086122]
  2. Jane Botsford Johnson Foundation
  3. Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI)
  4. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services
  5. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
  6. Research Council of Norway [189457, 190694, 196452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some studies suggest that prenatal infection increases risk of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). This study was undertaken in a prospective cohort in Norway to examine whether we could find evidence to support an association of the prenatal occurrence of fever, a common manifestation of infection, with ASD risk. Prospective questionnaires provided maternal exposure data; case status was established from clinical assessments and registry linkages. In a large, prospectively ascertained cohort of pregnant mothers and their offspring, we examined infants born. 32 weeks for associations between fever exposure in each trimester and ASD risk using logistic regression. Maternal exposure to second-trimester fever was associated with increased ASD risk, adjusting for presence of fever in other trimesters and confounders (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.79), with a similar, but nonsignificant, point estimate in the first trimester. Risk increased markedly with exposure to three or more fever episodes after 12 weeks' gestation (aOR, 3.12; 1.28-7.63). ASD risk appears to increase with maternal fever, particularly in the second trimester. Risk magnified dose dependently with exposure to multiple fevers after 12 weeks' gestation. Our findings support a role for gestational maternal infection and innate immune responses to infection in the pathogenesis of at least some cases of ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据