4.8 Review

The dopamine hypothesis of bipolar affective disorder: the state of the art and implications for treatment

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 666-679

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.16

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (UK)
  2. Wellcome trust
  3. National Institute of Health Research (UK)
  4. Maudsley Charity
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Lunbeck
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Janssen
  9. Servier
  10. Sunovion
  11. Cyberonics
  12. Wyeth
  13. Medical Research Council [1116129, MC_U120097115, MR/N026063/1, G0700995] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0616-10091, NF-SI-0513-10010, ACF-2016-17-005] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. MRC [G0700995, MR/N026063/1, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bipolar affective disorder is a common neuropsychiatric disorder. Although its neurobiological underpinnings are incompletely understood, the dopamine hypothesis has been a key theory of the pathophysiology of both manic and depressive phases of the illness for over four decades. The increased use of antidopaminergics in the treatment of this disorder and new in vivo neuroimaging and post-mortem studies makes it timely to review this theory. To do this, we conducted a systematic search for post-mortem, pharmacological, functional magnetic resonance and molecular imaging studies of dopamine function in bipolar disorder. Converging findings from pharmacological and imaging studies support the hypothesis that a state of hyperdopaminergia, specifically elevations in D2/3 receptor availability and a hyperactive reward processing network, underlies mania. In bipolar depression imaging studies show increased dopamine transporter levels, but changes in other aspects of dopaminergic function are inconsistent. Puzzlingly, pharmacological evidence shows that both dopamine agonists and antidopaminergics can improve bipolar depressive symptoms and perhaps actions at other receptors may reconcile these findings. Tentatively, this evidence suggests a model where an elevation in striatal D2/3 receptor availability would lead to increased dopaminergic neurotransmission and mania, whilst increased striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) levels would lead to reduced dopaminergic function and depression. Thus, it can be speculated that a failure of dopamine receptor and transporter homoeostasis might underlie the pathophysiology of this disorder. The limitations of this model include its reliance on pharmacological evidence, as these studies could potentially affect other monoamines, and the scarcity of imaging evidence on dopaminergic function. This model, if confirmed, has implications for developing new treatment strategies such as reducing the dopamine synthesis and/or release in mania and DAT blockade in bipolar depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据