期刊
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 43-61出版社
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2016.56
关键词
-
Why do disputants favor some conflict management strategies when managing certain territorial claim types-land, river, or maritime-but not others? We propose that state interests-defined via claim characteristics and interdependence-and transaction costs (i.e., the challenges associated with aggregating state preferences over outcomes) differ across claim types. These differences then incentivize states to cede varying levels of control over claim management, ultimately encouraging them to prioritize and institutionalize certain conflict management strategies when managing particular types of territorial claims. More specifically, we theorize and find that states pursue distinct management strategies when addressing their land (informal; bilateral negotiations and arbitration), river (more formal; third-party non-binding), and maritime claims (most formal; multilateral negotiations and legal processes).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据