4.5 Article

Characterization of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Isolated by Different Methods: A Comparison Study

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering6010008

关键词

extracellular vesicles; enrichment; ultracentrifugation; nanoparticle tracking analysis; lateral flow immunoassay

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO, Spain) [CTQ2013-47396-R, MAT2017-84959-C2-1-R]
  2. Consejeria de Economia y Empleo del Principado de Asturias (Plan de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion 2013-2017) [GRUPIN14-022]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. FICYT-Severo Ochoa pre-doctoral grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular vesicles (EV) are small membrane structures released by cells that act as potent mediators of intercellular communication. The study of EV biology is important, not only to strengthen our knowledge of their physiological roles, but also to better understand their involvement in several diseases. In the field of biomedicine they have been studied as a novel source of biomarkers and drug delivery vehicles. The most commonly used method for EV enrichment in crude pellet involves serial centrifugation and ultracentrifugation. Recently, different protocols and techniques have been developed to isolate EV that imply less time and greater purification. Here we carry out a comparative analysis of three methods to enrich EV from plasma of healthy controls: ultracentrifugation, ExoQuick(TM) precipitation solution (System Biosciences), and Total Exosome Isolation kit (Invitrogen). Our results show that commercial precipitation reagents are more efficient and enable higher EV enrichment factors compared with traditional ultracentrifugation, although subsequent imaging analysis is not possible with some of them. We hope that this work will contribute to the current research on isolation techniques to assist the progress of clinical applications with diagnostic or therapeutic objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据