4.7 Article

Regional Intestinal Permeability in Rats: A Comparison of Methods

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 4252-4261

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00279

关键词

intestinal permeability; Ussing chamber method; single-pass intestinal perfusion; jejunum; ileum; colon; rat

资金

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking - European Union [115369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, the screening of new drug candidates for intestinal permeation is typically based on in vitro models which give no information regarding regional differences along the gut. When evaluation of intestinal permeability by region is undertaken, two preclinical rat models are commonly used, the Ussing chamber method and single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP). To investigate the robustness of in vivo predictions of human intestinal permeability, a set of four model compounds was systematically investigated in both these models, using tissue specimens and segments from the jejunum, ileum, and colon of rats from the same genetic strain. The influence of luminal pH was also determined at two pH levels. Ketoprofen had high and enalaprilat had low effective (P-eff) and apparent (P-app) permeability in all three regions and at both pH levels. Metoprolol had high P-eff in all regions and at both pHs and high P-app at both pHs and in all regions except the jejunum, where P-app was low. Atenolol had low P-eff in all regions and at both pHs, but had high P-app at pH 6.5 and low P-app at pH 7.4. There were good correlations between these rat in situ P-eff (SPIP) and human in vivo P-eff determined previously for the same compounds by both intestinal perfusion of the jejunum and regional intestinal dosing. The results of this study indicate that both investigated models are suitable for determining the regional permeability of the intestine; however, the SPIP model seems to be the more robust and accurate regional permeability model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据