4.7 Article

P-gp Protein Expression and Transport Activity in Rodent Seizure Models and Human Epilepsy

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 999-1011

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00770

关键词

P-glycoprotein; blood brain barrier; status epilepticus; epilepsy; efflux transporter; pilocarpine

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [P30 AG028383]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1R01NS079507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cure for epilepsy is currently not available, and seizure genesis, seizure recurrence; and resistance to antiseizure drugs remain serious clinical problems. Studies show that the blood brain barrier is altered in animal models of epilepsy and in epileptic patients. In this regard, seizures increase expression of blood brain barrier efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which is thought to reduce brain uptake of antiseizure drugs, and thus, contribute to antiseizure drug resistance. The goal of the current study was to assess the viability of combining in vivo and ex vivo preparations of isolated brain capillaries from animal models of seizures and epilepsy as well as from patients with epilepsy to study P-gp at the blood brain barrier. Exposing isolated rat brain capillaries to gIntamate ex vivo upregulated P-gp expression to levels that were similar to those in capillaries isolated from rats that had status epilepticus or chronic epilepsy. Moreover, the fold increase in P-gp protein expression seen in animal models is consistent with the fold-increase in P-gp observed in-human brain capillaries isolated from patients with epilepsy compared to age-matched control individuals. Overall, the in vivo/ex vivo approach presented here allows detailed analysis of the mechanisms underlying seizure-induced changes of P-gp expression and transport activity at the blood brain barrier. This approach can be extended to other blood brain barrfer proteins that might contribute to drug-resistant epilepsy or other CNS disorders as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据