4.6 Article

Effects of Tenascin-C Knockout on Cerebral Vasospasm After Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Mice

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 1951-1958

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-017-0466-x

关键词

Cerebral vasospasm; Mitogen-activated protein kinase; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Tenascin-C

资金

  1. Mie Medical Research Foundation
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K19962]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08344, 15K19962] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A matricellular protein tenascin-C (TNC) has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but the direct evidence remains lacking. In this study, we examined effects of TNC knockout (TNKO) on cerebral vasospasm after experimental SAH in mice. C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) or TNKO mice were subjected to SAH by endovascular puncture. Ten WT and ten TNKO mice were randomized to WT sham (n = 4), TNKO sham (n = 4), WT SAH (n = 6), and TNKO SAH (n = 6) groups. In addition to neurobehavioral impairments and severity of SAH, cerebral vasospasm was assessed by morphometric measurements of the left internal carotid artery (ICA). Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the subarachnoid periarterial space was also assessed, and expressions of TNC and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in the ICA were immunohistochemically evaluated at 24 h post-surgery. TNC was induced in the smooth muscle cell layers and the adventitia in the spastic ICAs as well as the periarterial inflammatory cells in WT SAH mice. Compared with WT SAH mice, TNKO SAH mice showed better neurological scores and less severe cerebral vasospasm, as well as fewer inflammatory cell infiltration in the periarterial space. Post-SAH activation of MAPKs in the smooth muscle cell layers of the ICAs was also prevented in TNKO SAH mice. The findings in the present study suggest that TNC causes the development of cerebral vasospasm via pro-inflammatory effects and activation of MAPKs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据