4.6 Article

Self-assembled CdS quantum dots in carbon nanotubes: induced polysulfide trapping and redox kinetics enhancement for improved lithium-sulfur battery performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 806-815

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta09906e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21571080, 51502110]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin province [20170101193JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries appear to hold promise as next-generation energy storage systems owing to their theoretical energy density that is five times higher than commercial Li ion batteries. However, the insulating nature of sulfur/lithium sulfides and the severe polysulfide shuttle reaction between the Li anode and sulfur cathode can hinder their practical applications. Herein, we demonstrate the rational design and construction of CdS quantum dots uniformly attached to carbon nanotubes for sulfur infiltration, these structures were subsequently used as a high-performance sulfur cathode in lithium-sulfur batteries. This special architecture exhibits a high polysulfide adsorption and confinement while allowing fast electron and Li ion transfer. In addition, the synergic catalytic effect of the cadmium and the introduced heteroatoms favor the enhancement of the reaction kinetics. As a result, this carbon nanotubes/CdS quantum dots/S composite greatly improves the rate and cycle performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. The specific capacity decreases slowly from 1237.8 mA h g(-1) at 0.2C to 918.1 mA h g(-1) at 2.0C, showing an excellent rate performance and a good capacity retention of 820.6 mA h g(-1) at 0.5C for over 150 cycles with a coulombic efficiency of over 98.0%. The inclusion of the CdS quantum dots suppresses the shuttle effect and enhances the redox kinetics, thereby leading to the high utilization of sulfur, and thus providing new avenues for the design of advanced cathode materials for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据