4.5 Article

HMGB1 regulates P-glycoprotein expression in status epilepticus rat brains via the RAGE/NF-κB signaling pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 1691-1700

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6772

关键词

rat; status epilepticus; high-mobility group box 1; receptor for advanced glycation end-product; nuclear factor-kappa B; P-glycoprotein

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the brain is an important mechanism involved in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), an inflammatory cytokine, significantly increases following seizures and may be involved in upregulation of P-gp. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of HMGB1 and its downstream signaling components, receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B), on P-gp expression in rat brains during status epilepticus (SE). Small interfering RNA (siRNA) was administered to rats prior to induction of SE by pilocarpine, to block transcription of the genes encoding HMGB1 and RAGE, respectively. An inhibitor of NF-kappa B, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamic acid (PDTC), was utilized to inhibit activation of NF-kappa B. The expression levels of HMGB1, RAGE, phosphorylated-NF-kappa B p65 (p-p65) and P-gp were detected by western blotting. The relative mRNA expression levels of the genes encoding these proteins were measured using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the cellular localization of the proteins was determined by immunofluorescence. Pre-treatment with HMGB1 siRNA reduced the expression levels of RAGE, p-p65 and P-gp. PDTC reduced the expression levels of P-gp. These findings suggested that overexpression of P-gp during seizures may be regulated by HMGB1 via the RAGE/NF-kappa B signaling pathway, and may be a novel target for treating DRE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据