4.6 Article

Coupling pentlandite nanoparticles and dual doped carbon networks to yield efficient and stable electrocatalysts for acid water oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 461-468

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta09534e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China [21574084, 21571131]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2017A040405066]
  3. Shenzhen Government's Plan of Science and Technology [JCYJ20160308104704791, JCYJ20170818091657056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to develop [ow-cost eLectrocataLysts with high efficiency and strong stabiLity for acid oxygen evolution reactions (OER) will enable commerciaL applications of powerful proton exchange membranes (PEM) in water splitting devices. However, this remains challenging because most nonprecious metal based eLectrocataLysts suffer from strong corrosion in acid media. Herein, we crafted porous N, S-doped carbon network-immobilized uLtrafine pentlandites (i.e., Ni4Fe5S8) nanoparticLes (denoted P-NSC/ Ni4Fe5S8-1000) by employing rationally designed nanohybrids comprised of Liquid polymer-coated binary Prussian blue analogue (PBA) nanoparticLes (NPs) as precursors. Afterwards, the P-NSC/Ni4Fe5S81000 nanocomposites were exploited as OER eLectrocataLysts, with a small onset potentiaL of 1.53 V vs. RHE (1 mA cm(-2)) and strong stabiLity in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution, outperforming commerciaL RuO2 eLectrocataLysts. As revealed by both experimental results and DFT calculations, there is a synergy effect on the P-NSC/Ni4Fe5S8-1000 for OER: the pyridinic-N, S doped carbon could easily adsorb water, and then the highly active Fe sites of Ni4Fe5S8 NPs could catalyze the absorbed water to oxygen gas. Furthermore, the hierarchically porous nanostructure could promote multiphase transport during acid OER. Therefore, this work, for the first time, highlighted the great potentiaL of pentlandites NPs-based nanocomposites as efficient and stable eLectrocataLysts for acid OER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据