4.5 Article

Dopamine and serotonin contribute to Paecilomyces hepiali against chronic unpredictable mild stress induced depressive behavior in Sprague Dawley rats

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 5675-5682

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7261

关键词

Paecilomyces hepiali; chronic unpredictable mild stress; anti-depression; dopamine; 5-HT

资金

  1. Science and Technology Key Project in Jilin Province of China [20140301003YY, 20150203002NY, 20160520036JH]
  2. Twelfth Five-Year Science and Technology Planning Project of Jilin Province in China [2014B033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paecilomyces hepiali contains identical chemical constituents to Cordyceps sinensis, and it presents antidepressant-like activity via regulating noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems. Behavioral despair depression models serve important roles in scientific screening and evaluation of antidepressants. The present study aims to investigate the antidepressant-like activity of P. hepiali extract (PHC) in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS)-induced rat model of depression. Following four weeks of treatment, similar to fluoxetine at 3 mg/kg (positive drug), PHC at doses from 0.08 to 2.0 g/kg strongly increased sucrose preference and reduced the immobility time of depression-like rats in forced swimming test. The hypo-level of adrenocorticotropic hormone, noradrenaline and glucocorticoid receptor in serum and hypothalamus of depression-like rats was enhanced by PHC. PHC normalized CUMS-induced disorders of dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in serum and/or hypothalamus of depression-like rats. Moreover, PHC enhanced the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and reduced the levels of dopamine D2 receptor and 5-HT2A receptor in hypothalamus. These results suggested that the antidepressant-like effects of PHC in CUMS-induced depression are associated with not only the modulation of dopamine, but also the regulation of 5-HT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据