4.5 Article

Stilbene glycoside protects osteoblasts against oxidative damage via Nrf2/HO-1 and NF-κB signaling pathways

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 196-203

出版社

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.79937

关键词

THSG; osteoblast; oxidative damage; NF-kappa B; Nrf2/HO-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Oxidative stress is currently proposed as a risk factor associated with the development and progression of osteoporosis. Here, the effect of 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-D-glycoside (THSG) on oxidative damage was investigated in an osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cell model. Material and methods: In this study, MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (100 mu M) and THSG (20, 50 and 100 mu M), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). ROS and MDA levels were measured using specific kits. Meanwhile, cell viability and apoptosis were also assessed using MTT methods and flow cytometry, respectively. Then, expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream targets were determined using real-time PCR and western blotting, as well as the apoptosis related factors, including Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3, and caspase-9. Results: Upon H2O2 treatment, cell viability was significantly decreased, while THSG clearly attenuated this decrease in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the negative control, H2O2 significantly decreased ALP and increased the levels of MDA, ROS and apoptosis, while THSG markedly reversed these effects in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, THSG was identified to reverse the elevation of caspase-3, caspase-9 and Bax and the reduction of Bcl-2 induced by H2O2. For the Nrf2 signaling pathway, THSG was also observed to attenuate the up-regulation of Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1, and the down-regulation of NF-kappa B induced by H2O2. Conclusions: THSG could significantly attenuate oxidative damage induced by H2O2 via the Nrf2/NF-kappa B signaling pathway, providing new insights for treatments of osteoporosis induced by oxidative injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据