4.5 Article

Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract attenuates varicocele-induced testicular oxidative injury in rats by activating the Nrf2-antioxidant system

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 1799-1806

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8020

关键词

grape seed proanthocyanidin extract; varicocele; oxidative stress; Nrf2; testis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470987, 81670687]
  2. Tai Shan Scholar Foundation
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014HQ062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated whether grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (GSPE) can attenuate varicocele-induced testicular oxidative injury through the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant pathway. A varicocele model in rats was established by partial ligation of the left renal vein. Following 4 weeks of GSPE administration, the decreased sperm count and motility and other pathological changes caused by varicocele were significantly alleviated, as indicated by the results of computer-assisted sperm analysis and hematoxylin and eosin staining. In addition, the decreased antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase) activity and elevated oxidative stress level were partially reversed by administration of GSPE. Furthermore, the apoptotic level of the testis induced by varicocele was decreased by the GSPE treatment, according to terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay. Additionally, the expression of apoptosis-related proteins, including B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-like protein 4 and cleaved caspase-3, were also affected by GSPE. GSPE activated Nrf2, which is a key antioxidative transcription factor, with elevation of the downstream factor hemeoxygenase-1. These findings suggest that GSPE can ameliorate abnormal spermatogenesis and testicular injury in varicocele rats, potentially due to its antioxidative activity and ability to activate the Nrf2 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据