4.4 Article

How Strong is the Relationship Among Gold and USD Exchange Rates? Analytics Based on Structural Change Models

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 343-366

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-017-9743-z

关键词

Leverage effect; CUSUM test; Dynamic conditional correlation; Multivariate GARCH model; Time-varying correlation; Structural breaks; C13; C32; C58; G15

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 104-2410-H-035-004, MOST 105-2118-M-035-003-MY2]
  2. Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning [2015R1A2A2A010003894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the dynamic relationship among gold and USD exchange rates. Since one single time series model can suffer from structural (or parameter) changes in underlying models, we consider those models with structural breaks. We first employ the cumulative sum of squared residual test to determine the number and locations of change points in the volatility of time series and then divide the whole period by the change points to investigate the relationship between gold and USD exchange rates in each sub-period, based on the time-varying correlations obtained from dynamic conditional correlation models. We show that a negative correlation exists in almost all periods and that the correlation coefficients have higher absolute values during the global financial crisis period than in other periods. Furthermore, the correlation becomes much greater along with downside moves of USD versus upside moves, indicating that a depreciating trend of USD typically has more influence on gold than an appreciating trend. This phenomenon is in line with the leverage effect in financial markets. After comparing the two methods of with/without structural changes, our findings from an empirical study provide evidence that ignoring structural changes can lead to a false conclusion and confirm that our method offers a functional tool to analyze gold prices and USD exchange rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据