4.6 Article

A Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8010011

关键词

antibiotic stewardship; education and training; postgraduate; antimicrobial stewardship

资金

  1. Foreign and Commonwealth Office Grant
  2. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  3. Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC) as part of the Antimicrobial Cross Council initiative - seven UK research councils [ES/P008313/1]
  4. Global Challenges Research Fund
  5. National Institute for Health Research, UK Department of Health [HPRU-2012-10047]
  6. Public Health England
  7. ESRC [ES/P008313/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To understand the role of infrastructure, manpower, and education and training (E&T) in relation to Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) in Indian healthcare organizations. Methods: Mixed method approach using quantitative survey and qualitative interviews was applied. Through key informants, healthcare professionals from 69 hospitals (public & private) were invited to participate in online survey and follow up qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis was applied to identify the key emerging themes from the interviews. The survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 60 healthcare professionals from 51 hospitals responded to the survey. Eight doctors participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. 69% (27/39) of the respondents received E&T on AMS during undergraduate or postgraduate training. 88% (15/17) had not received any E&T at induction or during employment. In the qualitative interviews three key areas of concern were identified: (1) need for government level endorsement of AMS activities; (2) lack of AMS programs in hospitals; and, (3) lack of postgraduate E&T in AMS for staff. Conclusion: No structured provision of E&T for AMS currently exists in India. Stakeholder engagement is essential to the sustainable design and implementation of bespoke E&T for hospital AMS in India.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据