4.7 Article

Expected Imprints of the Carousel in Multi-frequency Pulsar Observations and New Evidence for Multi-altitude Emission

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 870, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf41c

关键词

pulsars: general; pulsars: individual (B1237+25); radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; stars: neutron

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant [617199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subpulse modulation has been regarded as one of the most insightful and intriguing aspects of pulsar radio emission. This phenomenon is generally explained by the presence of a carousel of sparks in the polar acceleration gap region that rotates around the magnetic axis due to the E x B drift. While there have been extensive single pulse studies, geometric signatures of the underlying carousel, or lack thereof, in simultaneous multi-frequency observations have remained largely unexplored. This work presents a theoretical account of such expected signatures, particularly that of a geometry induced phase-offset in subpulse modulation, including various formulae that can be readily applied to observations. A notable result is a method to resolve aliasing in the measured subpulse modulation period without relying on knowledge of the viewing geometry parameters. It is also shown in detail that the geometry induced phase-offset enables critical tests of various observed phenomena as well as proposed hypotheses, e.g., multi-altitude emission, magnetic field twisting, pseudo-nulls, etc., in addition to that of the carousel model itself. Finally, a detailed analysis of a 327 MHz pulse sequence of PSR B1237+25 is presented as a case study to test the single frequency multi-altitude emission scenario. The analysis provides firm evidence of the inner and outer conal components of this pulsar to have originated from the same carousel of sub-beams and emitted at different heights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据