期刊
QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 81-97出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1473325017700701
关键词
Critical interpretive synthesis; systematic review; secondary data analysis; methodology
类别
资金
- NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG015281] Funding Source: Medline
While secondary data analysis of quantitative data has become commonplace and encouraged across disciplines, the practice of secondary data analysis with qualitative data has met more criticism and concerns regarding potential methodological and ethical problems. Though commentary about qualitative secondary data analysis has increased, little is known about the current state of qualitative secondary data analysis or how researchers are conducting secondary data analysis with qualitative data. This critical interpretive synthesis examined research articles (n = 71) published between 2006 and 2016 that involved qualitative secondary data analysis and assessed the context, purpose, and methodologies that were reported. Implications of findings are discussed, with particular focus on recommended guidelines and best practices of conducting qualitative secondary data analysis.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据