4.4 Article

Dihydropyrimidinase deficiency in four East Asian patients due to novel and rare DPYS mutations affecting protein structural integrity and catalytic activity

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 122, 期 4, 页码 216-222

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.10.003

关键词

Dihydropyrimidinase; DPYS; Crystal structure; Functional and structural protein analysis; Patients

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K18961]
  2. Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K18961] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dihydropyrimidinase (DHP) is the second enzyme of the pyrimidine degradation pathway and catalyzes the ring opening of 5,6-dihydrouracil and 5,6-dihydrothymine. To date, only 31 genetically confirmed patients with a DHP deficiency have been reported and the clinical, biochemical and genetic spectrum of DHP deficient patients is, therefore, still largely unknown. Here, we show that 4 newly identified DHP deficient patients presented with strongly elevated levels of 5,6-dihydrouracil and 5,6-dihydrothymine in urine and a highly variable clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to infantile spasm and reduced white matter and brain atrophy. Analysis of the DHP gene (DPYS) showed the presence of 8 variants including 4 novel/rare missense variants and one novel deletion. Functional analysis of recombinantly expressed DHP mutants carrying the p.M250I, p.H295R, p.Q334R, p.T418I and the p.R490H variant showed residual DHP activities of 2.0%, 9.8%, 9.7%, 64% and 0.3%, respectively. The crystal structure of human DHP indicated that all point mutations were likely to cause rearrangements of loops shaping the active site, primarily affecting substrate binding and stability of the enzyme. The observation that the identified mutations were more prevalent in East Asians and the Japanese population indicates that DHP deficiency may be more common than anticipated in these ethnic groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据