4.7 Article

A from-benchtop-to-desktop workflow for validating HTS data and for taxonomic identification in diet metabarcoding studies

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 e146-e159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12703

关键词

cytochrome c oxidase I; diet studies; HTS data filtering; metabarcoding; taxonomic assignment

资金

  1. Electricite de France
  2. Syndicat Mixte d'Amenagement du Val Durance (France)
  3. Office National de l'Eau et des Milieux Aquatiques (France)
  4. Agence de l'Eau Rhone-Mediterranee (France)
  5. Conseil Regional de Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this work was to develop and validate a robust and reliable from-benchtop-to-desktop metabarcoding workflow to investigate the diet of invertebrate-eaters. We applied our workflow to faecal DNA samples of an invertebrate-eating fish species. A fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene was amplified by combining two minibarcoding primer sets to maximize the taxonomic coverage. Amplicons were sequenced by an Illumina MiSeq platform. We developed a filtering approach based on a series of nonarbitrary thresholds established from control samples and from molecular replicates to address the elimination of cross-contamination, PCR/sequencing errors and mistagging artefacts. This resulted in a conservative and informative metabarcoding data set. We developed a taxonomic assignment procedure that combines different approaches and that allowed the identification of similar to 75% of invertebrate COI variants to the species level. Moreover, based on the diversity of the variants, we introduced a semiquantitative statistic in our diet study, the minimum number of individuals, which is based on the number of distinct variants in each sample. The metabarcoding approach described in this article may guide future diet studies that aim to produce robust data sets associated with a fine and accurate identification of prey items.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据