4.7 Article

Present status of soil moisture estimation over the African continent

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 14-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.11.004

关键词

Calibration; In situ measurements; Modelling; Remote sensing; Validation

资金

  1. University of KwaZulu-Natal
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. Agricultural Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil moisture is the key parameter that governs the partitioning of the mass and energy fluxes between land and atmosphere through its influence on surface evaporation, runoff, albedo and emissivity. Therefore, accurate quantification of soil moisture is critical in the study of the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum as well as in hydrology and climate change studies. However, soil moisture remains a challenging hydrometeorological variable to monitor and interpret over high temporal and spatial resolution. The cost of setting up, operating and maintaining dense soil moisture networks across different agro-climatic zones of the African regions is currently financially unattainable due to high competition for resources. Consequently, soil moisture is often estimated indirectly, using both remote sensing and hydrological models, which provide periodic updates and valuable estimates at lower cost over African continent thus far. In recent years, huge efforts have been undertaken to install in situ soil moisture monitoring networks to support the satellite retrievals, satellite product improvement and modelling in Africa. However, the lack of large and representative in situ soil moisture monitoring networks across different agro-climatic zones of the African regions still hinders evaluation and verification of the most promising remote sensing products and hydrological models to estimate soil moisture. Consequently, the need for accurate and continuous real-time in situ soil moisture measurements covering a wide range of agro-climatic zones of the African continent is indisputable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据