4.8 Article

PRMT5-Dependent Methylation of the TIP60 Coactivator RUVBL1 Is a Key Regulator of Homologous Recombination

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 900-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Birminghamfellowship awarded
  2. MRC [MR/M009912/1, MR/M009882/1]
  3. CRUK senior fellowship [C17183/A13030]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) [PTDC/BBB-BEP/1463/2014]
  5. iNOVA4 Health Research Unit [LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007344]
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia/Ministerio da Ciencia e do Ensino Superior through national funds
  7. FEDER
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178788, MR/M009912/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [MR/M009912/1, MC_U105178788] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BBB-BEP/1463/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein post-translation modification plays an important role in regulating DNA repair; however, the role of arginine methylation in this process is poorly understood. Here we identify the arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 as a key regulator of homologous recombination (HR)-mediated double-strand break (DSB) repair, which is mediated through its ability to methylate RUVBL1, a cofactor of the TIP60 complex. We show that PRMT5 targets RUVBL1 for methylation at position R205, which facilitates TIP60-dependent mobilization of 53BP1 from DNA breaks, promoting HR. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that PRMT5-directed methylation of RUVBL1 is critically required for the acetyltransferase activity of TIP60, promoting histone H4K16 acetylation, which facilities 53BP1 displacement from DSBs. Interestingly, RUVBL1 methylation did not affect the ability of TIP60 to facilitate ATM activation. Taken together, our findings reveal the importance of PRMT5-mediated arginine methylation during DSB repair pathway choice through its ability to regulate acetylation-dependent control of 53BP1 localization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据