4.5 Article

Proximal Aberrant Crypt Foci Associate with Synchronous Neoplasia and Are Primed for Neoplastic Progression

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 486-495

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0380

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI at the NIH [1R01 CA159976]
  2. Department of Public Health, Biomedical Research [2012-0913]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are the earliest morphologically identifiable lesion found within the human colon. Despite their relatively high frequency in the distal colon, few studies have examined the molecular characteristics of ACF within the proximal colon. In the following study, clinical participants (n = 184) were screened for ACF using high-definition chromoendoscopy with contrast dye-spray. Following pathologic confirmation, ACF biopsies were subjected to laser capture microdissection (LCM), and epithelial cells were evaluated for somatic mutations with a customized colorectal cancer mutation panel using DNA-mass spectrometry. Samples were further characterized for microsatellite instability (MSI). Logistic models were used to associate proximal ACF with synchronous (detected during the same procedure) neoplasia. Thirty-nine percent of participants had at least one histologically confirmed proximal ACF. Individuals with a proximal ACF were significantly more likely to present with a synchronous neoplasm (P = 0.001), and specifically, a proximal, tubular, or tubulovillous adenoma (multivariable OR = 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.47; P = 0.027). Proximal ACF were more likely to be dysplastic (52%) compared with distal ACF (13%; P < 0.0001). Somatic mutations to APC, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and ERBB2 were detected in 37% of proximal ACF. Hyperplastic ACF were more often MSI-high, but there were no differences in MSI status observed by colonic location. In summary, ACF are identified in the proximal colons of approximately 40% of individuals undergoing chromoendoscopy and more often in patients with synchronous proximal adenomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据