4.6 Article

A Prussian blue-carbon paste electrode for selective cathodic amperometric determination of nitrite using a flow-injection analysis system with carrier recycling

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 939-946

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.030

关键词

Redox mediation; Food analysis; Water analysis; Flow-injection analysis; Carbon paste electrode

资金

  1. FAPEMIG [APQ-02497-12, APQ 01557-13]
  2. CNPq [447668/2014-5, 443315/2014-0]
  3. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A selective, simple, and low cost method for nitrite determination was developed using an FIA system with a Prussian blue-carbon paste electrode (PB-CPE) as an amperometric detector. The electrochemical sensor was prepared by a fast, simple, and inexpensive procedure, and the long-term stability of the electrode was quite satisfactory as the performance was maintained over one year. PB acted as an effective redox mediator for nitrite electroreduction in acidic media, allowing nitrite detection at +0.2 V vs. Ag/AgClsat, a potential at which most possible interfering species are not electroactive. Consequently, the proposed method was completely free from interference from nitrate, dissolved oxygen, ascorbic acid, and other species usually present in water and food samples. The electrochemical cell used in the FIA system was similar to a batch injection analysis cell, enabling recirculation of the carrier solution. This is an attractive feature because it allows the use of a high flow rate (6 mL min(-1)) leading to high sensitivity and analysis speed, while keeping reagent consumption low. Under the optimized conditions, the proposed method had a detection limit of 9 mu mol L-1 and was successfully employed for nitrite quantification in water and sausage samples. For all analyzed samples, recovery percentages close to 100% were obtained, which is indicative of the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据