4.4 Article

Truncating mutations of SPAST associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia indicate greater accumulation and toxicity of the M1 isoform of spastin

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 28, 期 13, 页码 1728-1737

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E17-01-0047

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS28785]
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Health CURE Program
  3. National Research Service Award from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1F31NS093748-01A1]
  4. Advanced Scholarship for Research into Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Related Diseases from the Tom Wahlig Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SPAST gene, which produces two isoforms (M1 and M87) of the microtubule-severing protein spastin, is the chief gene mutated in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Haploin-sufficiency is a popular explanation for the disease, in part because most of the >200 pathogenic mutations of the gene are truncating and expected to produce only vanishingly small amounts of shortened proteins. Here we studied two such mutations, N184X and S245X, and our results suggest another possibility. We found that the truncated M1 proteins can accumulate to notably higher levels than their truncated M87 or wild-type counterparts. Reminiscent of our earlier studies on a pathogenic mutation that generates full-length M1 and M87 proteins, truncated M1 was notably more detrimental to neurite outgrowth than truncated M87, and this was true for both N184X and S245X. The greater toxicity and tendency to accumulate suggest that, over time, truncated M1 could damage the corticospinal tracts of human patients. Curiously, the N184X mutation triggers the reinitiation of translation at a third start codon in SPAST, resulting in synthesis of a novel M187 spastin isoform that is able to sever microtubules. Thus microtubule severing may not be as reduced as previously assumed in the case of that mutation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据