4.8 Article

Avian Genomes Revisited: Hidden Genes Uncovered and the Rates versus Traits Paradox in Birds

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 3123-3131

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx236

关键词

aves; missing genes; evolutionary rate; life-history traits; recombination; GC content; biased gene conversion

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR ) [10-BINF-0001, ANR-15-CE12-0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to current assemblies, avian genomes differ from those of the other lineages of amniotes in 1) containing a lower number of genes; 2) displaying a high stability of karyotype and recombination map; and 3) lacking any correlation between evolutionary rates (dN/dS) and life-history traits, unlike mammals and nonavian reptiles. We question the reality of the bird missing genes and investigate whether insufficient representation of bird gene content might have biased previous evolutionary analyses. Mining RNAseq data, we show that the vast majority of the genes missing from avian genome assemblies are actually present in most species of birds. These mainly correspond to the GC-rich fraction of the bird genome, which is the most difficult to sequence, assemble and annotate. With the inclusion of these genes in a phylogenomic analysis of high-quality alignments, we uncover a positive and significant correlation between the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rate (dN/dS) and life-history traits in Neoaves. We report a strong effect of GC-biased gene conversion on the dN/dS ratio in birds and a peculiar behavior of Palaeognathae (ostrich and allies) and Galloanserae (chickens, ducks and allies). Avian genomes do not contain fewer genes than mammals or nonavian reptiles. Previous analyses have overlooked similar to 15% of the bird gene complement. GC-rich regions, which are the most difficult to access, are a key component of amniote genomes. They experience peculiar molecular processes and must be included for unbiased functional and comparative genomic analyses in birds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据