4.6 Article

PTCy-based haploidentical vs matched related or unrelated donor reduced-intensity conditioning transplant for DLBCL

期刊

BLOOD ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 360-369

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027748

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIBMTR
  2. EBMT
  3. National Cancer Institute
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [5U24CA076518]
  6. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [4U10HL069294]
  7. Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSH250201200016C]
  8. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2388, N00014-16-1-2020]
  9. Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  10. Amgen, Inc.
  11. Amneal Biosciences
  12. Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.
  13. Astellas Pharma US
  14. Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.
  15. Be the Match Foundation
  16. bluebird bio, Inc.
  17. Bristol Myers Squibb Oncology
  18. Celgene Corporation
  19. Cerus Corporation
  20. Chimerix, Inc.
  21. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  22. Gamida Cell Ltd.
  23. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  24. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  25. Immucor
  26. Incyte Corporation
  27. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
  28. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  29. Juno Therapeutics
  30. Kite Pharma, Inc.
  31. Medac, GmbH
  32. MedImmune
  33. Medical College of Wisconsin
  34. Merck Co, Inc.
  35. Mesoblast
  36. MesoScale Diagnostics, Inc.
  37. Millennium
  38. Takeda Oncology Co.
  39. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  40. National Marrow Donor Program
  41. Neovii Biotech NA, Inc.
  42. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  43. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. - Japan
  44. PCORI
  45. Pfizer, Inc
  46. Pharmacyclics, LLC
  47. PIRCHE AG
  48. Sanofi Genzyme
  49. Seattle Genetics
  50. Shire
  51. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  52. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  53. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  54. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Inc.
  55. Takeda Oncology
  56. Telomere Diagnostics, Inc.
  57. University of Minnesota
  58. Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively compared long-term outcomes of nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning (NMC/RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical family donor (haplo-HCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) with those of matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) with or without T-cell depletion (TCD+/TCD-) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Adult patients with DLBCL who had undergone their first NMC/RIC allo-HCT between 2008 and 2015 were included. Recipients of haplo-HCT were limited to those receiving graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PTCy. GVHD prophylaxis in MSD was limited to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based approaches without in vivo TCD, while MUD recipients received CNI-based prophylaxis with or without TCD. Outcome analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and disease relapse/progression were calculated. A total of 1438 patients (haplo, 132; MSD, 525; MUD TCD+, 403; and MUD TCD-, 378) were included. Patients with haplo donors were significantly older, had a better performance status and had more frequently received total body irradiation-based conditioning regimens and bone marrow grafts than MSD and MUD TCD+ or TCD-. 3-year OS, PFS, NRM and relapse/progression incidence after haplo-HCT was 46%, 38%, 22%, and 41%, respectively, and not significantly different from outcomes of matched donor transplants on multivariate analyses. Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD compared with MSD, MUD TCD+/TCD-. NMC/RIC haplo-HCT with PTCy seems to be a valuable alternative for patients with DLBCL considered for allo-HCT but lacking a matched donor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据