4.5 Article

Effects of Mutations on the Aggregation Propensity of the Human Prion-Like Protein hnRNPA2B1

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00652-16

关键词

aggregation; low-complexity domain; prion-like; prions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1517231]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM105991]
  3. NIH [R35NS097974]
  4. Colorado State University
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1517231] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hundreds of human proteins contain prion-like domains, which are a subset of low-complexity domains with high amino acid compositional similarity to yeast prion domains. A recently characterized mutation in the prion-like domain of the human heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein hnRNPA2B1 increases the aggregation propensity of the protein and causes multisystem proteinopathy. The mutant protein forms cytoplasmic inclusions when expressed in Drosophila, the mutation accelerates aggregation in vitro, and the mutant prion-like domain can substitute for a portion of a yeast prion domain in supporting prion activity. To examine the relationship between amino acid sequence and aggregation propensity, we made a diverse set of point mutations in the hnRNPA2B1 prion-like domain. We found that the effects on prion formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and aggregation in vitro could be predicted entirely based on amino acid composition. However, composition was an imperfect predictor of inclusion formation in Drosophila; while most mutations showed similar behaviors in yeast, in vitro, and in Drosophila, a few showed anomalous behavior. Collectively, these results demonstrate the significant progress that has been made in predicting the effects of mutations on intrinsic aggregation propensity while also highlighting the challenges of predicting the effects of mutations in more complex organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据