4.7 Article

Portable tumor biosensing of serum by plasmonic biochips in combination with nanoimprint and microfluidics

期刊

NANOPHOTONICS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 307-316

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2018-0173

关键词

plasmonics; nanoimprint lithography; biosensing; microfluidics; immunochip

资金

  1. NSAF [U1830116]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2017J01123]
  4. NSFC [61307042]
  5. University of Southampton Zepler Institute Research Collaboration Stimulus Fund [517719105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmonic sensing has a great potential in the portable detection of human tumor markers, among which the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used in clinical medicine. Traditional plasmonic and non-plasmonic methods for CEA biosensing are still not suitable for the fast developing era of Internet of things. In this study, we build up a cost-effective plasmonic immunochip platform for rapid portable detection of CEA by combining soft nanoimprint lithography, microfluidics, antibody functionalization, and mobile fiber spectrometry. The plasmonic gold nanocave array enables stable surface functionality, high sensitivity, and simple reflective measuring configuration in the visible range. The rapid quantitative CEA sensing is implemented by a label-free scheme, and the detection capability for the concentration of less than 5 ng/ml is achieved in clinical experiments, which is much lower than the CEA cancer diagnosis threshold of 20 ng/ml and absolutely sufficient for medical applications. Clinical tests of the chip on detecting human serums demonstrate good agreement with conventional medical examinations and great advantages on simultaneous multichannel detections for high-throughput and multi-marker biosensing. Our platform provides promising opportunities on low-cost and compact medical devices and systems with rapid and sensitive tumor detection for point-of-care diagnosis and mobile healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据