4.6 Article

Recurrent IDH2 R172X mutations in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 650-659

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.239

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma has long been considered a diagnosis of exclusion; to date, the molecular pathogenetic basis for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma is unknown. To identify potential oncogenic drivers in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, targeted next-generation sequencing of 300 cancer-related genes was performed on 11 cases of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. We identified IDH2 R172X mutations in 55% of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas including R172S, R172T, and R172M. Multispecific mutant IDH1/2 immunohistochemistry was performed and identified mutant-specific protein expression in all cases with available tissue: 3/3 sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas with R172 mutations were positive and 4/4 wild-type cases were negative. Review of sequencing data for our institutional head and neck cohorts (n=412) confirmed the absence of IDH-activating mutations in other tumor types. Alterations in the IDH2-wild-type sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas included SMARCA4 loss-of-function with confirmed loss of immunohistochemical expression, NOTCH1 gain-of-function, and TET2 loss-of-function. We demonstrate that the majority of histologically defined sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas are characterized by IDH2 R172X mutations and overexpression of mutant protein. IDH2 R172X mutations are specific to sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma among carcinomas of the head and neck, confirming this tumor type as a distinct clinicopathologic entity. These findings have significant implications for diagnosis and therapy with IDH inhibitors for patients with this rare and poorly understood tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据