4.7 Article

Pathway enrichment analysis approach based on topological structure and updated annotation of pathway

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 168-177

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx091

关键词

differentially expressed genes; topological property; KEGG; pathway; enrichment analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571169]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [QC2014C017]
  3. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UNPYSCT-2015037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathway enrichment analysis has been widely used to identify cancer risk pathways, and contributes to elucidating the mechanism of tumorigenesis. However, most of the existing approaches use the outdated pathway information and neglect the complex gene interactions in pathway. Here, we first reviewed the existing widely used pathway enrichment analysis approaches briefly, and then, we proposed a novel topology-based pathway enrichment analysis (TPEA) method, which integrated topological properties and global upstream/downstream positions of genes in pathways. We compared TPEA with four widely used pathway enrichment analysis tools, including database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery (DAVID), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), centrality-based pathway enrichment (CePa) and signaling pathway impact analysis (SPIA), through analyzing six gene expression profiles of three tumor types (colorectal cancer, thyroid cancer and endometrial cancer). As a result, we identified several well-known cancer risk pathways that could not be obtained by the existing tools, and the results of TPEA were more stable than that of the other tools in analyzing different data sets of the same cancer. Ultimately, we developed an R package to implement TPEA, which could online update KEGG pathway information and is available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TPEA/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据