4.4 Article

Presence of eating disorders and its relationship to anxiety and depression in pregnant women

期刊

MIDWIFERY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 12-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.005

关键词

Eating disorders; High-risk pregnancy; Anxiety; Depression; Women's health issues

类别

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil) [2013/10686-7]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/10686-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: women who have inadequate nutrient intake are more likely to develop a risky pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of eating disorders and its association with anxiety and depression symptomatology in high-risk pregnancies. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and prospective study conducted at the tertiary university hospital in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. 913 pregnant women waiting for the Obstetrics' outpatient appointment were invited to participate in the study on their 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Structured interviews were carried out and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were applied. Findings: prevalence of eating disorder (ED) during pregnancy was 7.6% (n=69) (95% CI: 5.84% -9.28%), 0.1% (n=1) for anorexia nervosa; 0.7% (n=6) for bulimia nervosa; 1.1% (n=10) for binge eating disorder, and 5.7% (n=52) for pica. A statistically significant difference was found between the anxiety (p < 0.01) and depressive symptoms (p < 0.01). Conclusions: the prevalence of ED ( 7.6%) and its association with anxiety and depression symptoms during pregnancy highlights the need for specialist care for prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Given the importance of proper nutrition during pregnancy, both with regard to maternal health and fetal development, it is necessary to have specific predetermined evaluation protocols implemented by health care professionals for the diagnosis of ED during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据