4.8 Article

A general approach for the site-selective modification of native proteins, enabling the generation of stable and functional antibody-drug conjugates

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 694-700

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04645j

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Cambridge Trusts
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P020291/1]
  4. Royal Society (Wolfson Research Merit Award)
  5. EPSRC
  6. BBSRC
  7. MRC
  8. Royal Society
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P020291/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/P020291/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of targeted therapeutics that utilize the specificity of antibodies to selectively deliver highly potent cytotoxins to target cells. Although recent years have witnessed significant interest in ADCs, problems remain with the standard linkage chemistries used for cytotoxin-antibody bioconjugation. These typically (1) generate unstable constructs, which may lead to premature cytotoxin release, (2) often give a wide variance in drug-antibody ratios (DAR) and (3) have poor control of attachment location on the antibody, resulting in a variable pharmacokinetic profile. Herein, we report a novel divinylpyrimidine (DVP) linker platform for selective bioconjugation via covalent re-bridging of reduced disulfide bonds on native antibodies. Model studies using the non-engineered trastuzumab antibody validate the utility of this linker platform for the generic generation of highly plasma-stable and functional antibody constructs that incorporate variable biologically relevant payloads (including cytotoxins) in an efficient and site-selective manner with precise control over DAR. DVP linkers were also used to efficiently re-bridge both monomeric and dimeric protein systems, demonstrating their potential utility for general protein modification, protein stabilisation or the development of other protein-conjugate therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据