4.6 Review

Revisiting polymeric single lithium-ion conductors as an organic route for all-solid-state lithium ion and metal batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 1917-1935

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta09056d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program [2017M1A2A2087810, 2018R1A2A1A05019733, 2018M3D1A1058624, 2017R1D1A1B03033699]
  2. Wearable Platform Materials Technology Center through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016R1A5A1009926]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current surge in demand for high-performance batteries has inspired the relentless pursuit of advanced battery materials and chemistry. Notably, all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries and lithium metal batteries that have recently come into the spotlight have stimulated our research interest in solid-state electrolytes as a promising alternative to conventional liquid electrolytes. Among the various solid-state electrolytes explored to date, polymeric single lithium-ion conductors (polymeric SLICs) have garnered considerable attention as an organic approach that is different from the widely investigated solid inorganic electrolytes. A salient feature of polymeric SLICs is the predominant contribution of Li+ ions to the ionic conductivity, thus enabling the Li+ ion transference number to reach almost unity. This exceptional single ion transport behavior of polymeric SLICs, in combination with their solid-state nature, flexibility and facile processability, brings remarkable benefits to the battery structure and performance, which lie far beyond those achievable with typical dual-ion conductive electrolytes. In this review, we describe the current status and challenges of polymeric SLICs in terms of chemical/structural design and synthesis strategies. Also, the development direction and future outlook of polymeric SLICs are presented with a focus on their potential for application in the newly emerging Li battery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据