4.7 Article

Oxygen Profiles Across the Sea-Surface Microlayer-Effects of Diffusion and Biological Activity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00011

关键词

oxygen gradients; sea-surface microlayer; microsensors; net community production; gas exchange; neuston; plankton; diffusion

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) project PASSME [GA336408]
  2. Poul Due Jensen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas exchange across the air-water interface is strongly influenced by the uppermost water layer (<1 mm), the sea-surface microlayer (SML). However, a clear understanding about how the distinct physicochemical and biological properties of the SML affect gas exchange is lacking. We used an automatic microprofiler with Clark-type microsensors to measure small-scale profiles of dissolved oxygen in the upper 5 cm of the water column in a laboratory tank filled with natural seawater. We aimed to link changing oxygen concentrations and profiles with the metabolic activity of plankton and neuston, i.e., SML-dwelling organisms, in our artificial, low-turbulence set-up during diel cycles. We observed that temporal changes of the oxygen concentration in near surface water (5 cm depth) could not be explained by diffusive loss of oxygen, but by planktonic activity. Interestingly, no influence of strong neuston activity on oxygen gradients at the air-water interface was detectable. This could be confirmed by a modeling approach, which revealed that neuston metabolic activity was insufficient to create distinct curvatures into these oxygen gradients. Moreover, the high neuston activity in our study contributed only <= 7.1% (see Supplementary Table 4) to changes in oxygen concentration in the tank. Overall, this work shows that temporal and vertical variation of oxygen profiles across the air-water interface in controlled laboratory set-ups is driven by biological processes in the underlying bulk water, with negligible effects of neuston activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据