4.7 Article

Development of MIL-101(Cr)/GrO composites for adsorption heat pump applications

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 180-191

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.020

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Characterization; Adsorption; Heat pump; Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/L505882/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L505882/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. The British Council [216418549] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption heat pumps can be used for generating heating, cooling, seasonal energy storage and water desalination applications. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid porous materials with high surface area and superior adsorption characteristics compared to conventional adsorbents. MIL-101(Cr) has a large pore size with water vapour adsorption capacity up to 1.5 g(H20) g(ads) and high cyclic stability, and thus has the potential to be used in adsorption heat pumps. This work investigates the enhancement of the thermal conductivity and water adsorption characteristics of MIL-101(Cr) using hydrophilic graphene oxide. Two methods have been used to develop MIL-101(Cr)/GrO composites. The first method was through the physical mixing of GrO and MIL-101(Cr) while the other was through incorporating the GrO during the synthesis process of MIL-101(Cr). The composites and neat MIL-101(Cr) were characterized in terms of their structure, water adsorption uptake, BET surface area, particle size, thermal gravimetric analysis, SEM images and thermal conductivity measurements. Results showed that introducing low amounts of GrO (2%) to the neat MIL-101(Cr) enhanced the water adsorption characteristics at high relative pressure but enhanced the heat transfer properties by 20-30% while using more than 2% of GrO reduced the water adsorption uptake but significantly enhanced the thermal conductivity by more than 2.5 times. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据