4.7 Article

Porous carbons derived from pyrene-based conjugated microporous polymer for supercapacitors

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 73-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.048

关键词

Conjugated microporous polymer; Carbonization; Carbon material; Pore size distribution; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21304055, 21574077]
  2. Shaanxi Innovative Team of Key Science and Technology [2013KCT-17]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201501002]
  4. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering from Sichuan University [skIpme2016-4-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous carbons with high surface area were obtained by pyrolysis of a pyrene-based conjugated microporous polymer with potassium hydroxide active agent. Nitrogen adsorption and desorption measurements demonstrated that the surface area, pore volume, pore size and pore size distributions of the resulting carbon materials are significantly dependent on the activation temperature. The performances of the supercapacitors fabricated from these carbon materials were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, electrochemical capacitance and long cyclic stability. The results revealed that SDBPy-800-based electrode shows the highest specific capacitance of 301 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) in a three-electrode system among the three carbonized materials. A symmetric supercapacitor was further fabricated from SDBPy-800 in a two-electrode system, which also exhibits a high specific capacitance of 176 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.25 A g(-1), high rate capability and excellent cycling stability with the capacitance retention of 92.6% after 10,000 cycles. These results demonstrated that these porous carbon materials are promising for high-performance supercapacitors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据