4.7 Article

Constraining Metallicity-dependent Mixing and Extra Mixing Using [C/N] in Alpha-rich Field Giants

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 872, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaff66

关键词

infrared: stars; stars: abundances

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1211853]
  2. Vanderbilt Office of the Provost through the Vanderbilt Initiative in Data-intensive Astrophysics (VIDA) fellowship
  3. Premium Postdoctoral Research Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  4. Hungarian NKFI Grants of the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office [K-119517]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA-2017-88254-P]
  6. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute [51424]
  7. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  8. Crafoord Foundation
  9. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmastare
  10. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  11. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  12. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  13. Brazilian Participation Group
  14. Carnegie Institution for Science
  15. Carnegie Mellon University
  16. Chilean Participation Group
  17. French Participation Group
  18. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  19. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  20. Johns Hopkins University
  21. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  23. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  24. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  25. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  26. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  27. National Astronomical Observatory of China
  28. New Mexico State University
  29. New York University
  30. University of Notre Dame
  31. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  32. Ohio State University
  33. Pennsylvania State University
  34. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  35. United Kingdom Participation Group
  36. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  37. University of Arizona
  38. University of Colorado Boulder
  39. University of Oxford
  40. University of Portsmouth
  41. University of Utah
  42. University of Virginia
  43. University of Washington
  44. University of Wisconsin
  45. Vanderbilt University
  46. Yale University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Internal mixing on the giant branch is an important process which affects the evolution of stars and the chemical evolution of the galaxy. While several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this mixing, better empirical constraints are necessary. Here, we use [C/N] abundances in 26,097 evolved stars from the SDSS-IV/APOGEE-2 Data Release 14 to trace mixing and extra mixing in old field giants with -1.7 < [Fe/H] < 0.1. We show that the APOGEE [C/N] ratios before any dredge-up occurs are metallicity dependent, but that the change in [C/N] at the first dredge-up is metallicity independent for stars above [Fe/H] similar to -1. We identify the position of the red giant branch (RGB) bump as a function of metallicity, note that a metallicity-dependent extra mixing episode takes place for low-metallicity stars ([Fe/H] < -0.4) 0.14 dex in log g above the bump, and confirm that this extra mixing is stronger at low metallicity, reaching Delta[C/N] = 0.58 dex at [Fe/H] = -1.4. We show evidence for further extra mixing on the upper giant branch, well above the bump, among the stars with [Fe/H] < -1.0. This upper giant branch mixing is stronger in the more metal-poor stars, reaching 0.38 dex in [C/N] for each 1.0 dex in log g. The APOGEE [C/N] ratios for red clump (RC) stars are significantly higher than for stars at the tip of the RGB, suggesting additional mixing processes occur during the helium flash or that unknown abundance zero points for C and N may exist among the RC sample. Finally, because of extra mixing, we note that current empirical calibrations between [C/N] ratios and ages cannot be naively extrapolated for use in low-metallicity stars specifically for those above the bump in the luminosity function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据