4.5 Article

Fluid pumping and cells separation by DC-biased traveling wave electroosmosis and dielectrophoresis

期刊

MICROFLUIDICS AND NANOFLUIDICS
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-1862-2

关键词

DC offset; Traveling wave electroosmosis; Pump; Dielectrophoresis; Separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305106, 11672095, 11372093]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. NSRIF. 2014058, HIT. IBRSEM. 201319]
  3. Self-Planned Task of State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (HIT) [201510B, SKLRS201606C]
  4. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B07018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid pumping in microchips using electrokinetic methods has been a hot area of research. This paper mainly investigates effects of DC offset imposed on traveling wave (TW) signal on electroosmotic flow above a spiral electrode array with 800 mu m wavelength. The traveling wave voltage with different DC offsets was applied, and four cases were analyzed by superimposing consecutive images. Experiment results indicate that symmetric electrode array energized with DC-biased TW signal can not only generate a prominent improvement in flow rates, but also be capable of altering the flow direction by changing the polarity of electrical signal. Furthermore, such a device can also be used as an effective means to manipulate and separate PS microbeads and cells on their own for very small and non-flowing sample volumes in terms of the combination of the conventional dielectrophoresis (cDEP) forces and traveling wave DEP (twDEP) forces by properly choosing the parameters associated with the Clausius-Mossotti factor (K(w)). Through adjusting the applied frequencies, we successfully separated yeast cells from a mix containing PS microspheres based on the combination of cDEP and twDEP, providing new opportunities for integration with a charge-coupled device for various biomedical diagnostic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据