4.8 Article

Cathodized copper porphyrin metal-organic framework nanosheets for selective formate and acetate production from CO2 electroreduction

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 2199-2205

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04344b

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [21505076]
  2. Young Elite Scholar Support (YESS) Program from CAST
  3. Program of Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor
  4. NSF of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20150967]
  5. Innovation Team Program of Jiangsu Province of China
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient and selective Cu catalyst for CO2 electroreduction is highly desirable since current catalysts suffer from poor selectivity towards a series of products, such as alkenes, alcohols, and carboxylic acids. Here, we used copper(II) paddle wheel cluster-based porphyrinic metal-organic framework (MOF) nanosheets for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction and compared them with CuO, Cu2O, Cu, a porphyrin-Cu(II) complex and a CuO/complex composite. Among them, the cathodized Cu-MOF nanosheets exhibit significant activity for formate production with a faradaic efficiency (FE) of 68.4% at a potential of -1.55 V versus Ag/Ag+. Moreover, the C-C coupling product acetate is generated from the same catalyst together with formate at a wide voltage range of -1.40 V to -1.65 V with the total liquid product FE from 38.8% to 85.2%. High selectivity and activity are closely related to the cathodized restructuring of Cu-MOF nanosheets. With the combination of X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, we find that Cu(II) carboxylate nodes possibly change to CuO, Cu2O and Cu4O3, which significantly catalyze CO2 to formate and acetate with synergistic enhancement from the porphyrin-Cu(II) complex. This intriguing phenomenon provides a new opportunity for the rational design of high-performance Cu catalysts from pre-designed MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据