4.5 Article

Zinc-Chelating Small Molecules Preferentially Accumulate and Function within Pancreatic β Cells

期刊

CELL CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 213-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.10.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stanford Diabetes Research Center [P30DK116074]
  2. NIH [P30 CA124435]
  3. ChEM-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training Program [GM120007]
  4. Bio-X and Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship
  5. Friedenrich Diabetes Fund
  6. Endocrinology Training grant [T32DK007217]
  7. Molecular Pharmacology Training grant [T32GM113854]
  8. SPARK Translational Research Program
  9. Child Health Research Institute at Stanford University [UL1TR001085]
  10. NIH NIDDK [P30DK116074, R01DK101530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes is a hyperglycemic condition characterized by pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction and depletion. Whereas methods for monitoring beta-cell function in vivo exist, methods to deliver therapeutics to beta cells are lacking. We leveraged the rare ability of beta cells to concentrate zinc to preferentially trap zinc-binding molecules within beta cells, resulting in beta-cell-targeted compound delivery. We determined that zinc-rich beta cells and islets preferentially accumulated TSQ (6-methoxy-8-p-toluenesulfonamido-quinoline) in a zinc-dependent manner compared with exocrine pancreas. Next, we asked whether appending a zinc-chelating moiety onto a beta-cell replication-inducing compound was sufficient to confer preferential beta-cell accumulation and activity. Indeed, the hybrid compound preferentially accumulated within rodent and human islets in a zinc-dependent manner and increased the selectivity of replication-promoting activity toward beta cells. These data resolve the fundamental question of whether intracellular accumulation of zinc-chelating compounds is influenced by zinc content. Furthermore, application of this principle yielded a proof-of-concept method for beta-cell-targeted drug delivery and bioactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据